We thank Mr. Schleede for granting permission to post his recent commentary:
January 3, 2011
False claims that “wind farms” provide large economic and job benefits
One would think that by now Obama Administration officials would admit that “wind farms” do not provide large economic and job benefits. However, recent Administration statements suggest the delusion continues and, perhaps, that officials do not understand why their expectations are unrealistic.
False expectations may be due to the infamous “JEDI” model (Jobs and Economic Development Impact model) developed for DOE’s National Renewable Energy “Laboratory” (NREL) by a wind industry consultant-lobbyist. Unfortunately, this “model” (paid for with our tax dollars) has been widely promoted by NREL and DOE and outputs from the model are used by “wind farm” developers to mislead the public, media, and government officials.
Economic models often produce false or misleading outputs because (a) the model itself is faulty, and/or (b) unrealistic assumptions are “fed into” to model, with the result that the models overstate national, state, and/or local job and other economic benefits. In the case of wind energy models, basic flaws and faulty assumptions often include one or more of the following:
1. Ignoring the fact that much of the capital cost of “wind farms” is for equipment purchased elsewhere, often imported from other countries. Some wind energy advocates claim that wind turbines are “manufactured” in the US when, in fact, they are merely assembled in the US using imported parts and components. About 75% of the capital cost of “wind farms” is for turbines, turbine parts and components, towers and blades – so a large share of the “wind farm” cost is for imports. These add to the outflow of wealth from the US and provide no economic or job benefits in the US.
2. Assuming that employment during project construction results in new jobs for local workers — when most “wind farm” construction jobs are short term (6 months or less) and the overwhelming share of them are filled by specialized workers who are brought in temporarily.
3. Assuming that the very few permanent “wind farm” jobs are new jobs filled by local workers – when, in fact, these few permanent jobs are often filled by people brought in for short periods. Some “wind farm” owners contracts with suppliers of wind turbines and other equipment for maintenance work with the result that no “new” jobs for local workers are added.
4. Assuming that temporary workers who are brought in for short periods live and spend their pay checks — and pay taxes — locally when, in fact, these workers spend most of their wages where they and their families have permanent residences — where the workers spend most of their weekends and where they pay nearly all of their taxes.
5. Assuming that the full purchase price of the goods and services purchased locally (often minimal in any case) has a local economic benefit. In fact, only the local value added may have a local economic benefit. This truth is illustrated by the purchase of a gallon of gasoline — let’s say for $3.00. Only the wages of the service station employees, the dealer’s margin, and the taxes paid locally or to the state mayl have a local or state economic benefit. Economic benefits associated with the share of the $3.00 that pays for the crude oil (much of it imported), refining, wholesaling, and transportation generally flows elsewhere.
6. Assuming that land rental payments to land owners for allowing wind turbines all have local economic benefit. In fact, these payments will have little or no local economic benefit when the payments are to
absentee landowners OR if the money is spent or invested elsewhere or is used to pay income taxes that flow to Washington DC or state capitals.
7. Using “input-output” models that spit out “indirect” job and other economic benefits that, in effect, magnify (a) all of the overestimates identified above, and (b) use unproven formula and data to calculate alleged “multiplier” effects.
8. Ignoring the environmental and economic COSTS imposed by “wind farm” development, which include (a) environmental, ecological, and economic costs associated with the production of the equipment, and constructing and operating the “wind farm” (e.g., site and road clearing, (b) wildlife habitat destruction, noise, bird and bat kills and interference with migration and refuges, (c) scenic impairment, (d) neighboring property value impairment, and (e) infrastructure costs.
9. Ignoring the fact that electricity produced from wind turbines, has less real value than electricity from reliable generating units — because that output is intermittent, volatile and unreliable. Also, the electricity is most likely to be produced at night in colder months, not on hot weekday late afternoons in July and August when demand is high and the economic value of electricity is high.
10. Ignoring the “backup power” costs; i.e., the added cost resulting from having to keep reliable generating units immediately available (often running at less than peak efficiency) to keep electric grids in balance when those grids have to accept intermittent, volatile and unreliable output from “wind farms.”
11. Ignoring the fact that electricity from “wind farms” in remote areas generally results in high unit costs of transmission due to (a) the need to add transmission capacity, (b) the environmental, scenic and property value costs associated with transmission lines, (c) the electric transmission “line losses” (i.e., electricity produced by generating units but lost during transmission and never reaches customers or serves a useful purpose), and (d) inefficient use of transmission capacity because “wind farms” output is intermittent and unpredictable and seldom at the capacity of the transmission line that must be built to serve the “wind farm.”
12. Ignoring the fact that the higher true cost of the electricity from wind is passed along to ordinary electric customers and taxpayers via electric bills and tax bills which means that people who bear the costs have less money to spend on other needs (food, clothing, shelter, education, medical care — or hundreds of other things normally purchased in local stores), thus reducing the jobs associated with that spending and undermining local economies that would benefit from supplying these needs.
13. Perhaps most important, ignoring the fact that the investment dollars going to “renewable” energy sources would otherwise be available for investment for other purposes that would produce greater economic benefits. “Wind farms” have very high capital costs and relatively low operating costs compared to generating units using traditional energy sources. They also create far fewer jobs, particularly long-term jobs, and far fewer local economic benefits. “Wind farms” are simply a poor choice if the goals are to create jobs, add local economic benefits, or hold down electric bills.
Glenn R. Schleede
Round Hill, VA 20141-2574
Allegheny Treasures Note: “Mr. Schleede is the author of many papers and reports on energy matters. He is now retired but continues to analyze and write about federal and state energy policies, particularly those affecting wind energy.”
“Until retiring, Schleede maintained a consulting practice, Energy Market and Policy Analysis, Inc. (EMPA) Prior to forming EMPA, Schleede was Vice President of New England Electric System (NEES), Westborough, MA, and President of its fuels subsidiary, New England Energy Incorporated. Previously, Schleede was Executive Associate Director of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (1981), Senior VP of the National Coal Association in Washington (1977) and Associate Director (Energy and Science) of the White House Domestic Council (1973). He also held career service positions in the U.S. OMB and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.”
“He has a BA degree from Gustavus Adolphus College and an MA from the University of Minnesota. He is also a graduate of Harvard Business School’s Advanced Management Program.“
If you are looking for a limo service, Austin TX has top quality luxury limos that are perfect for any occasion. Whether you are going to prom or going out for your bachelorette party, Austin Prestige Limos is everything you need!
Austin limo service, Austin Prestige Limo, specializes in all formal events. From Bachelorette parties to corporate meetings, reserve a limo for exactly what you need!
When looking to find a top-quality limo, Austin TX company, Austin Prestige Limo makes sure you get what you need. Top-quality limousines are always driven by experienced professionals who are always wearing formal attire.
If you are looking for Austin Limousine services for your special occasion, Austin Prestige Limo has everything you need. Specializing in events ranging from prom to corporate meetings, you can be sure that you will be getting top quality services from the limo to the driver and everything in between.
Find the limos of Austin you have looking for, for your special event. Whether for personal use, or for that big meeting you have been anticipating, Austin Prestige Limo offers top quality services that will help you impress.
Searching for an orthopedic surgeon, San Marcos TX? Look no further than Joint Pain Orthopedics. Where they specialize in all kinds of treatment, operative and non-operative.
When looking for a quality hip surgeon, San Antonio company Joint Pain Orthopedics is there to help you with any ailments you have, and help your surgery go as easily as possible.
Looking for the best hip surgeon – Austin TX company Joint Pain Orthopedics has quality hip treatments for whatever might be ailing you.
Find the best knee surgeon in Austin, Texas at Joint Pain Orthopedics!
Find your orthopedic surgeon, Austin TX! Joint Pain Orthopedics specializes in all kinds of treatment, operative and nonoperative to help you with any symptoms or ailments.
Don’t stress about your knee replacement, San Antonio. Call Joint Pain Orthopedics today to talk to a top-notch professional.
You’ll never need another orthopedic doctor, San Antonio. Joint Pain Orthopedics has the professionals with the experience and compassion you are looking for.
Looking for a company to help with your home design, La Grange TX? Shroyco has the professionals that you need to get the job done.
It’s not hard to find the right home builders, La Grange TX. Shroyco will help make it perfect every step of the way.
Looking for the area’s best home builders, Round Top TX area? Shroyco has knowledgeable professionals that have your best interests in mind.
When looking for a specific design build, Round Top TX has the know-how and professionalism to help you accomplish your home design goals!
When searching for the perfect architectural design, La Grange TX professionals from Shroyco can help you live your dream!
In Austin gutters are integral to the structural integrity of the home. From preventing water buildup around the home to preventing water damage to siding, gutters are massively important. For gutter replacement and repair, contact Spade Roofing.
The most trusted Austin house painter service in Austin is at Spade Roofing. With fifteen years in the home exterior industry, their professionals have what it takes to perform the best home painting services in town.
Spade Roofing is considered the best roofing company Austin tx has to offer. Fifteen years of industry experience and earning customer trust has made them a household name.