We thank Mr. Schleede for granting permission to post his recent commentary:
January 3, 2011
False claims that “wind farms” provide large economic and job benefits
One would think that by now Obama Administration officials would admit that “wind farms” do not provide large economic and job benefits. However, recent Administration statements suggest the delusion continues and, perhaps, that officials do not understand why their expectations are unrealistic.
False expectations may be due to the infamous “JEDI” model (Jobs and Economic Development Impact model) developed for DOE’s National Renewable Energy “Laboratory” (NREL) by a wind industry consultant-lobbyist. Unfortunately, this “model” (paid for with our tax dollars) has been widely promoted by NREL and DOE and outputs from the model are used by “wind farm” developers to mislead the public, media, and government officials.
Economic models often produce false or misleading outputs because (a) the model itself is faulty, and/or (b) unrealistic assumptions are “fed into” to model, with the result that the models overstate national, state, and/or local job and other economic benefits. In the case of wind energy models, basic flaws and faulty assumptions often include one or more of the following:
1. Ignoring the fact that much of the capital cost of “wind farms” is for equipment purchased elsewhere, often imported from other countries. Some wind energy advocates claim that wind turbines are “manufactured” in the US when, in fact, they are merely assembled in the US using imported parts and components. About 75% of the capital cost of “wind farms” is for turbines, turbine parts and components, towers and blades – so a large share of the “wind farm” cost is for imports. These add to the outflow of wealth from the US and provide no economic or job benefits in the US.
2. Assuming that employment during project construction results in new jobs for local workers — when most “wind farm” construction jobs are short term (6 months or less) and the overwhelming share of them are filled by specialized workers who are brought in temporarily.
3. Assuming that the very few permanent “wind farm” jobs are new jobs filled by local workers – when, in fact, these few permanent jobs are often filled by people brought in for short periods. Some “wind farm” owners contracts with suppliers of wind turbines and other equipment for maintenance work with the result that no “new” jobs for local workers are added.
4. Assuming that temporary workers who are brought in for short periods live and spend their pay checks — and pay taxes — locally when, in fact, these workers spend most of their wages where they and their families have permanent residences — where the workers spend most of their weekends and where they pay nearly all of their taxes.
5. Assuming that the full purchase price of the goods and services purchased locally (often minimal in any case) has a local economic benefit. In fact, only the local value added may have a local economic benefit. This truth is illustrated by the purchase of a gallon of gasoline — let’s say for $3.00. Only the wages of the service station employees, the dealer’s margin, and the taxes paid locally or to the state mayl have a local or state economic benefit. Economic benefits associated with the share of the $3.00 that pays for the crude oil (much of it imported), refining, wholesaling, and transportation generally flows elsewhere.
6. Assuming that land rental payments to land owners for allowing wind turbines all have local economic benefit. In fact, these payments will have little or no local economic benefit when the payments are to
absentee landowners OR if the money is spent or invested elsewhere or is used to pay income taxes that flow to Washington DC or state capitals.
7. Using “input-output” models that spit out “indirect” job and other economic benefits that, in effect, magnify (a) all of the overestimates identified above, and (b) use unproven formula and data to calculate alleged “multiplier” effects.
8. Ignoring the environmental and economic COSTS imposed by “wind farm” development, which include (a) environmental, ecological, and economic costs associated with the production of the equipment, and constructing and operating the “wind farm” (e.g., site and road clearing, (b) wildlife habitat destruction, noise, bird and bat kills and interference with migration and refuges, (c) scenic impairment, (d) neighboring property value impairment, and (e) infrastructure costs.
9. Ignoring the fact that electricity produced from wind turbines, has less real value than electricity from reliable generating units — because that output is intermittent, volatile and unreliable. Also, the electricity is most likely to be produced at night in colder months, not on hot weekday late afternoons in July and August when demand is high and the economic value of electricity is high.
10. Ignoring the “backup power” costs; i.e., the added cost resulting from having to keep reliable generating units immediately available (often running at less than peak efficiency) to keep electric grids in balance when those grids have to accept intermittent, volatile and unreliable output from “wind farms.”
11. Ignoring the fact that electricity from “wind farms” in remote areas generally results in high unit costs of transmission due to (a) the need to add transmission capacity, (b) the environmental, scenic and property value costs associated with transmission lines, (c) the electric transmission “line losses” (i.e., electricity produced by generating units but lost during transmission and never reaches customers or serves a useful purpose), and (d) inefficient use of transmission capacity because “wind farms” output is intermittent and unpredictable and seldom at the capacity of the transmission line that must be built to serve the “wind farm.”
12. Ignoring the fact that the higher true cost of the electricity from wind is passed along to ordinary electric customers and taxpayers via electric bills and tax bills which means that people who bear the costs have less money to spend on other needs (food, clothing, shelter, education, medical care — or hundreds of other things normally purchased in local stores), thus reducing the jobs associated with that spending and undermining local economies that would benefit from supplying these needs.
13. Perhaps most important, ignoring the fact that the investment dollars going to “renewable” energy sources would otherwise be available for investment for other purposes that would produce greater economic benefits. “Wind farms” have very high capital costs and relatively low operating costs compared to generating units using traditional energy sources. They also create far fewer jobs, particularly long-term jobs, and far fewer local economic benefits. “Wind farms” are simply a poor choice if the goals are to create jobs, add local economic benefits, or hold down electric bills.
Glenn R. Schleede
Round Hill, VA 20141-2574
Allegheny Treasures Note: “Mr. Schleede is the author of many papers and reports on energy matters. He is now retired but continues to analyze and write about federal and state energy policies, particularly those affecting wind energy.”
“Until retiring, Schleede maintained a consulting practice, Energy Market and Policy Analysis, Inc. (EMPA) Prior to forming EMPA, Schleede was Vice President of New England Electric System (NEES), Westborough, MA, and President of its fuels subsidiary, New England Energy Incorporated. Previously, Schleede was Executive Associate Director of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (1981), Senior VP of the National Coal Association in Washington (1977) and Associate Director (Energy and Science) of the White House Domestic Council (1973). He also held career service positions in the U.S. OMB and the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission.”
“He has a BA degree from Gustavus Adolphus College and an MA from the University of Minnesota. He is also a graduate of Harvard Business School’s Advanced Management Program.“
When shopping for companies that do commercial roofing, El Paso company, Roof Solutions is your number one local roofer with the best workmanship warranties. With top quality work and satisfaction guaranteed, Roof Solutions in the company businesses trust.
Looking for some leaking Roof Repair – El Paso gets the job done right with Roof Solutions. From minor roof repairs to whole roof replacement, Roof Solutions offer a free inspection to find the best option.
Searching for a quality El Paso roofer can be taxing on your patience. Highly recommended and referred to as the best roofing company in town, Roof Solutions have the roofers El Paso can depend on. From free estimates to guaranteed satisfaction, residents can’t go wrong.
When residents and businesses are looking for professional roofing, El Paso turns to the company they know they can rely on. Roof Solutions is the number one local roofer and has the best workmanship warranties. Get the job done right with Roof Solutions.
Mental health is not something to be taken lightly or for granted. Anyone having trouble with the stresses of daily life should take advantage of mental health services Los Angeles residents trust from Hope School of Mental Health.
Nowadays online shopping is more and more frequently. Luckily, purchasing a CPAP online is also an option.
The Resmed air mini is small and compact. This makes it perfect for those who are always on the go. Traveling for business, or traveling for pleasure, never be without your CPAP machine.
In order to provide optimal sleep therapy, the Resmed Autoset 10 is designed to cover the nose and mouth. It has a unique frame that adjusts to many different face structures, in order to be as comfortable as possible.
Getting a CPAP prescription online is easier than one might think. By simply signing up for the Easy Breathe prescription package, one can be obtained 100% online.
When looking to purchase a CPAP machine without prescription, Easy Breathe is here to help. The Easy Breathe online store provides a variety of masks, and headgear that can be purchased without any prescription.
Shopping for Resmed CPAP supplies is easy with Easy Breathe. The online store has everything available – from masks, to machines, and even replacement parts.
For those who don’t have time to go to a sleep clinic, the home sleep apnea test machine is the perfect option. By filling out a quick questionnaire, a test can be obtained in no time at all, and done in the comfort of the home.
The Air Fit F20 is a full face mask that is specifically designed to provide a strong seal in any pressure. This mask is designed for optimal sleep therapy.
Selling mineral rights to a property should be handled carefully, which is why you need to hire an experienced establishment like San Saba Royalty. They offer a smooth, efficient acquisition process while delivering excellent customer service. San Saba knows how to find some of the best properties available and make sound investments in them. If you need a stress-free service for selling your mineral interests, don’t hesitate to get in touch with San Saba Royalty Company, LLC. They have a dedicated team that will make sure your interests are protected during this process.